Case Study LAB

Infill Density & Pattern Study

Dogbone specimens across multiple infill patterns, densities, and materials, followed by tensile-strength comparison.

Infill Density & Pattern Study

Print → test → compare.

The portfolio describes dogbone specimens printed across multiple materials, patterns, and densities and then subjected to tensile testing.

The website separates pattern families instead of compressing them into one small collage.

Specimen architecture

Pattern groups,
separated.

The original multi-specimen comparison has been split into separate pattern-family figures.

Rectilinear

Low-, medium-, and high-density rectilinear dogbone geometry.

Rectilinear infill specimens

Triangle

Low-, medium-, and high-density triangle infill specimens.

Triangle infill specimens

Honeycomb

Low-, medium-, and high-density honeycomb specimens.

Honeycomb infill specimens

100% infill

Solid reference specimen used in the design comparison.

100 percent infill specimen
01
Analysis

Review the simulated specimen response.

The source folder includes a simulation result for a dogbone specimen, shown as a standalone figure.

SimulationDogbone specimen
Infill dogbone simulation

Tensile-strength comparison

The source chart compares tensile strength across infill levels and material/pattern combinations.

Tensile strength chart
Study structure

Patterns, densities, and materials compared.

The source chart presents comparative tensile-strength results across the tested combinations.